It’s the first honest-to-God weekend that I’ve had in a while. I had work through the weekend over most of January and February, and before that was sick with what felt like the flu.
I woke up New Year’s Day with a mystery rash, on top of otherwise feeling rotten. (No, not drunk. I had gone to bed around 8 p.m., and woke up briefly around midnight to watch the ball drop on television.) Feeling a little panicked, I went to the hospital.
“Did you have chicken pox?” the doctor asked.
“Yeah… when I was six,” I answered.
The rash was apparently shingles, left over from 50 years ago. The doctor prescribed some pills that, as far as I could tell, did exactly nothing. The rash faded, very slowly, and I got better under my own power, drinking lots of orange juice, and tea instead of coffee.
Six weeks later, I got a note from my insurance company: the hospital had charged about $3000 for my little jaunt, of which I will have to pay $1000.
* * *
More recently, a troubled young man shot up a high school in Florida, killing 17. Another nut with a gun: it’s the kind of event that seems to be happening more frequently, and the usual response from the media and politicians is for more gun control.
I have to disagree.
I’ll grant that, among the things that government can do, gun control is relatively simple. But what about controlling the nut: the troubled young man behind the trigger?
School shootings appear to be almost exclusively limited to the United States, in the past 20 years or so. Somehow, other places in the world seem to do an adequate job of nut control. We did, too, in the past. What changed?
To be sure, nut control, unlike gun control, can’t be done by fiat. It’s the responsibility of parents, siblings, teachers, friends, and anyone encountering a troubled young person in need of help.
But there’s more than that. I’m coming to believe that something—likely more than one something—in our way of bringing up young people is causing young men to become nihilist exterminators.
Why not young women? (All the school shootings I’m aware of have been perpetrated by males.)
That may be a clue.
* * *
My son, who has a more liberal outlook than I do, was mumbling something the other day about the National Rifle Association (NRA). In the wake of the Florida shooting, the NRA has been denounced as an agent of the gun manufacturers, who are simply interested in selling more product.
Perhaps they are. They are certainly lobbyists, seeking to influence the government to advance their agenda.
But their agenda is the Second Amendment, which states plainly, ‘the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The Founders included the Second Amendment for some very good reasons, and it’s not something to cast aside lightly.
I live in New York City and I don’t own a gun: I don’t feel a practical need for one, and it’s too much trouble (so much for ‘shall not be infringed’) to acquire and keep a gun in my home. But I reserve the right to arm myself, should I find it necessary, and if I can’t do so legally, I’ll move.
For that reason, I’m considering joining the NRA, even though I normally don’t think much of lobbyists. The next time my son mumbles something about the NRA, I could show him my membership card and say, “Do you mean… me?”
And as far as the Second Amendment, I’d rather see an honest debate about repealing it than yet another measure nibbling around the edges. If you believe that guns are a public health menace and should be banned on those grounds, and that the Second Amendment’s time has passed, stand up and say so.